A compensation agreement requires the applicant to pay the legal representative a fixed part of his injury if the case is successful. This is thought to be beneficial to the complainant, since the lawyer handling the case is financially motivated to obtain the maximum possible payment, as this has a direct impact on the amount they receive after the conclusion of the case. The benefit to the solicitor is questionable, especially for low-value rights, as they end up taking all the risk and have nothing in the end; or worse, the money owed to the client, depending on the damages recovered and the payment of legal fees. In some areas, the Commission may be willing to accept a CFA for the payment of some or all of their royalties, by meeting defined criteria for success. Individual advisors may be reluctant to take RISKS for commercial dispute resolution transactions, or may only be willing to jeopardize a relatively small percentage of their royalties. The DBA is a kind of “emergency fee agreement” where a lawyer (or other legal representative) provides services for a specified amount based on the amount of a “specified financial benefit” obtained in the case for which services are provided. This generally means that a lawyer, instead of a conventional hourly basis, amounts to a percentage of the amount of damages suffered by the losing party to the client. The result is some notable consequences: first, the text of the new legislation seems to indicate that DBAs cannot be used to finance defence cases; second, the payment is due not only when a lawyer obtains a favourable result for the client, but only after a sum of money or other “specified financial benefit” is actually recovered. The trial of an interim case took place and the judgment of the High Court (Lexlaw Ltd/Zuberi [2020] EWHC 1855 (Ch) (10 July 2020) confirmed as a matter of urgency that the payment rules relating to early termination in DBAs are perfectly legal. The clarity given by HHJ Parfitt with respect to DBA settlements will expand access to justice, as theimpitless parties will be able to pursue civil and commercial disputes through damages-based agreements.
Success fees are the percentage of the damage we charge if you have successfully claimed and recover damages from your opponent, either as a result of legal proceedings or by comparison. We agree with you on what is considered a success and when we will be paid. We will also agree on the percentage of damage we can receive. There is also legislation that defines the maximum percentages that can be charged in some cases. Compensation agreements have not prospered as a funding agreement. Many lawyers (and lawyers) have refused to enter into these agreements. The reasons are Legion. A particular problem was the unfortunate question of whether a compensation agreement reached in civil proceedings could legitimately contain conditions that require a client who terminates the contract prematurely to pay the lawyer for his time on the watch and the payments made. In appropriate cases, our lawyers may offer you a compensation agreement as a financing option. This financing option has only been in place since April 2013 in commercial cases. A compensation agreement is an agreement between you and Stephensons, committing to pay a percentage of the damage if the proceedings against the opponent are won.
Comments are closed.