The agreement ended on June 1, 1865. [8] A CAR official, A. Rutkovski, was sent to London, where he reached the British capital in January 1865 and made a proposal to HBC. In exchange for an annual payment of $3,000, which retains the operating stations and rights to an ice harvesting monopoly, the RAC would lease all of Russia`s land south of Mount St. Elijah. [9] All Russian fur traders would also operate only on behalf of HBC. Historian John Semple Galbraith considered Rutkski`s thoughtful offer “such a proposal would have been accepted without much hesitation if it had been made twenty years earlier. But the same uncertainties about the value of the fur trade that prompted the Russians to make such an offer in 1865 prevented the Hudson`s Bay Company from accepting it. [9] At that time, the British had already formulated plans to create stations in the Yukon, where domestic trade could continue to be accessible. [10] Shortly after the ratification of the purchase of Alaska by the United States of America, HBC asked whether the lease was still in effect. Mikhail Tebenkov replied that the RAC itself was not aware of the terms of the contract, but stated that the company “can only assume that the assignment itself will cause our government`s refusal to sanction our agreement with your honourable counsel for the continuation of the lease of stackine`s territory.” [10] Although the HBC requested an end to the agreement when the formal transfer was made to the Americans, it considered that it could continue to work unilaterally in the Stikine Of lisi; an interpretation that the Americans did not recognize. [10] The RAC-HBC agreement then had a portion of the Alaskan border dispute.
The agreement was renewed continuously, but with several changes made in the following years. Another version was agreed upon by the two companies and came into force on April 3, 1849. [6] This trade agreement denounced the PSAC, which made agricultural and pastoral products available to the New Archer. [7] The intrusion of American settlers into the property of the company under the Oregon Treaty, in connection with the California Gold Rush,[8] left Fort Cowlitz and Fort Nisqually understaffed and greatly reduced operational capabilities. [7] Although Fort Langley and Fort Victoria produced much of the wheat quota for Russian America after 1846, the British were unable to meet the Russians` food needs. The RAC Board of Directors found that HBC`s position in favour of halting the russian authorities` supply was “based on perfectly valid reasons”. [7] In addition, the Russian authorities claimed exclusive rights to timber, fishing and ice within the HBC-occupied part of the Alaska Panhandle to allow new agreements with other companies to exploit the resources. [9] After Fraser`s gold rush, many small traders began operating under the HBC concession, under-listing British fur trading efforts. In the 1860s, the Labouchere operated within the rented area. [10] In 1862, HBC`s board of directors complained to its Russian counterparts that it did not “grant us protection and the whole territory is also free for petty traders who do not pay rent… »… [10] Despite this economic competition and declining profits, HBC signed the renewed protocols.
[9] Download the recommended clause referring disputes to arbitration proceedings managed by the Russian arbitrator for the combined amount your employee will pay to all: Winter Academy on International Arbitration “Beyond the Imaginable Borders: Transformation of Arbitration” Initiate arbitration, follow the history, download the necessary documents (including on smartphones) with a click and download them. The CAR and RIMA have the full compliance audit and the full review of the RAC arbitration rules and procedures You can deduct THE RAC contributions from your employee`s gross salary as part of the net salary agreement for the calculation of their tax.
Comments are closed.